Superior Outcome of Women With Stage I/II Cutaneous Melanoma: Pooled Analysis of Four European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Phase III Trials
Author Interview Arjen Joosse, Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherland
What are the main findings of the study?
The basic finding in the article is that women fare better than men when they are diagnosed with a localized melanoma, this being a melanoma which has not been metastasized to either lymph nodes or to other organs than the skin.
One could summarize the article with the conclusion that the advantage of women is approximately 30%. The 30% advantage applies to survival, thus women have a 30% better chance (hazard ratio) to survive their melanoma. It also applies to having a metastasis: women have a 30% lower chance to experience a metastasis to the lymph nodes and to other organs. The consistency of the finding is also reflected that it applies to different subgroups e.g. younger versus older patients, melanomas on the limbs and on the trunk, different subtypes such as nodular versus superficial spreading melanomas, and so on. Finally, in our analysis, women of pre- and postmenopausal age (<45 years and > 60 yrs) had an equal advantage over men of the same age. Therefore, the female hormones (which decline after menopause) do not seem to cause this female advantage.
Our main conclusion is that this advantage of 30% is probably caused by a biological difference across gender, as we adjusted for many factors which are related to behavior; such as tumor thickness and body site of the tumor. Also, the subgroup analysis suggests that behavior cannot fully explain the advantage for women.
For example, if earlier detection in females due to increased awareness is the causative factor (as suggested by Sondak and Berwick in the editorial), then we would expect this earlier detection to translate into thinner tumors in female, and when investigating the thinnest tumors, there would be no (or a considerably smaller) male disadvantage. This is not true; males fare worse in thicker and in thinner tumors, as well as for truncal and limb melanomas.
Were any of the findings unexpected?
The female advantage was known from the results of other studies.
However, we were surprised to see that the magnitude was so consistently 30% across different endpoints. Furthermore, in our article we also make a comparison to other large studies reporting gender hazard ratio’s, and we see the 30% magnitude again in all these studies. So it seems a very robust advantage for females across continents, subgroups, and different study designs.
What should clinicians and patients take away from this study?
That male gender is a disadvantageous prognostic factor in melanoma, for which the explanation is yet unknown. We agree with Sondak and Berwick that due to incomplete data and understanding of the pathway, it is premature to have different treatment strategies for melanoma across gender. However, when seeing two melanoma patients in your clinic with equal tumor characteristics, one being male, one female, it might be useful to realize that the female patient has a 30% lower risk to metastasize or die from the disease. In the future, one could imagine that this leads to differences in follow-up after the diagnosis across gender. However, more research is needed.
What recommendations do you have for dermatology health care providers as a result of your study?
Our main message goes out to all the researchers working in the melanoma field, from bench to bedside: keep gender in mind. There is a “gender factor” which influences melanoma so profoundly that it results in this robust 30% female advantage. Unraveling the mechanism behind this phenomenon could be valuable to find new treatment strategies.
If researchers take gender into account of all their analyses, we moght stumble upon the explanation. Based on literature research, we suggest a few biological explanations in our article: recently, we published a review on gender differences in reactive oxygen species as a possible explanation for this gender difference in melanoma (Joosse et al, Pigment Cell Melanoma Research, june 2010).
Other explanations might relate to gender differences in vitamin D, male hormones or immune homeostasis.
Citation:
Superior Outcome of Women With Stage I/II Cutaneous Melanoma: Pooled Analysis of Four European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Phase III Trials
Arjen Joosse, Sandra Collette, Stefan Suciu, Tamar Nijsten, Ferdy Lejeune, Ulrich R. Kleeberg, Jan Willem W. Coebergh, Alexander M.M. Eggermont, and Esther de Vries
JCO JCO.2011.38.0584; published online on April 30, 2012;